Entry tags:
(no subject)
MindHacks links to an article about a marital rating chart from the 1930s. Note that only the Wife's Scale exists. The image reproduced from it shows only the first 12 of 50 Merits and Demerits, and I note that when I tally up the points from them for myself, I score an impressive -2.* It would be higher [ETA: lower, I mean], but I do not currently wear red nail polish and the only time I warm my cold feet on someone, it's because I'm doing the "See how cold I am?! TURN THE HEAT UP!" thing.**
I sort of want to find the full scale now, to see how I rate with the full test.
* I am assuming that if I wore hose with seams, they would always be crooked, because things just do that on me.
** Or revenging myself on someone who's stolen the blanket.
I sort of want to find the full scale now, to see how I rate with the full test.
* I am assuming that if I wore hose with seams, they would always be crooked, because things just do that on me.
** Or revenging myself on someone who's stolen the blanket.

no subject
no subject
This was hilarious - thanks for sharing!
no subject
no subject
Joe, on the other hand, would probably make someone a passable wife.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't understand what they mean by this "dressed for breakfast" thing, though. I mean, why would I bother taking pj's off before settling in on the couch with a bowl of cold cereal balanced in my lap? That would be very uncomfortable. Oh well, to each hir own kink.
no subject
no subject
Hilariously enough it just makes me think of my Crack!tastic guy, the gay Russian general guy who likes to wear women's lingerie. Apart from lacking Merits #8 and #10, his only Demerits are #10 and #12. Which amuses me to no end since it is certainly helluva better rating than me. xD
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm endlessly amused that there's a merit for going to church - you certainly wouldn't see that in any politically correct scoring method now. Not that rating your wife is a very PC thing to be doing in the first place, at least not without a 'rate your husband' companion to it.
no subject
(-4, I think.)
no subject
no subject
I had to adapt some of the questions to fit me, though. I took off points for 'slow in coming to bed' because I am a night owl, and for 'wears ragged dresses, etc, around the house', because when I'm at home, I live in my old PJs. I also wear red nail polish (horrors!) and while I don't wear hose, I'm sure that if I did the seams would be crooked. Also, I'm a backseat driver.
This is such a bizarre set of guidelines. I mean, really. Nail polish? Crooked hems? Surely these are not things that have the potential to destroy a marriage? Sheesh. It would funny if not for the fact that someone actually created the list in absolute seriousness. That just makes it icky.
no subject
no subject
No, no, if you score under 24 you're still a failure as a wife! (They didn't seem to think negative scores were possible. Or at least the bottom range starts at zero.)
no subject
no subject
Me? Positive. No surprise there. Only a 1, but that's still positive. It'd be much more impressively positive if I'd taken it a few years ago, while I was actively attending church and still bullyragging the boys into going to Sunday School (at their, different, church), and/or if I weren't such an inveterate flirt (which is, of course, less demeritous in my poly environment).
I'd kind of like to see the full test, too. (And I suspect that there *was* a "husband" version of the test, even if it hasn't been preserved. The guy parleyed this into a matchmaking service, after all....)
no subject
http://flickr.com/photos/tiabla/sets/72157605047200616/
no subject
That's actually probably a bigger reason for my conclusion than the reasons originally stated, but I neglected to mention it. *blush* That's what I get for whipping off a quickie response just before heading out the door....
no subject
no subject
Edit: And I thought cold feet in the bed was one of the privileges of marriage!