telophase: (Princess Tutu - O.o // base by sub_divid)
telophase ([personal profile] telophase) wrote2006-03-17 01:16 pm

Hmm...

Well, [livejournal.com profile] sub_divided, it looks like we've hit Anime News Network with the Samurai Zombie thing.

[identity profile] oneiroelpida.livejournal.com 2006-03-18 06:59 am (UTC)(link)
Whoah. I could see they were ridiculously similiar, but I didn't realize they were THAT close. Why would anyone think they could get away with that? It breaks my brain. I need duct tape.

And people want to believe they can away with the "percentage" rule because people want to break the rules and still have a flimsy excuse. It's sorta like the kid standing next to the cookie jar with a cookie and then saying, "But you didn't see me take it! You can't prove I took it! The cookies just happen to be the same KIND as in the jar!"

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2006-03-18 07:02 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention that the percentage thing is a GUIDELINE for FAIR USE, and that the rest of the fair use guidelines involve things like NOT MAKING A PROFIT and FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. Which guidelines this entry just does not meet.

[identity profile] lanisatu.livejournal.com 2006-03-19 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
If you're copying your own work, changing a few things, and then submitting it to whomever, it's not plagiarism. Adding this stipulation -- that you need to make some changes for it to not be considered plagiarism anymore -- makes sense. But this only works in the case of your own work. (at least this is now the case where I am)

I can't think of a non-educational reason for slightly altering your own work though...

(of course, this isn't the case this time. They're obviously plagiarizing)