telophase: (Hiromasa - Uh...what?)
telophase ([personal profile] telophase) wrote2006-03-09 12:07 pm
Entry tags:

Memeage



http://neuropolitics.org/Processsurvey2006q2p1.asp

-----------------------
Personal Evaluation
Your responses are consistent with the following attributes: You have a probable elevation in noradrenergic activity, and concurrent deficit in dopaminergic activity. You also have a probable elevation in activity in your prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus in your right hemisphere. Your right prefrontal cortex is more involved in your political decision-making than your left. Your olfactory system plays a stronger than average role in mating behavior. Indicators of enhanced right prefrontal and bilateral temporal activity in humor detection. Prefrontal cortical regions are facilitating greater than average behavioral inhibition. Color preferences may indicate an enhanced dopamine level in your visual cortex. Responses point to a probable increase in activity in the right anterior cingulate and amygdala. You have a higher tolerance for ambiguity in your thinking styles, and a greater inhibition of your left inferior parietal cortex. You exhibit an elevation in visuospatial task performance. This seems to be primarily facilitated by your prefrontal cortex. Your responses indicated a slight tendency to classify facial expressions as less threatening, and a more bilateral orientation of the amygdalae for facial recognition. You exhibited an elevation in emotional recognition in this survey. Overall, your cognitive style is shifted more towards your right hemisphere.
Thanks for your help!




via [livejournal.com profile] rustybitch

[identity profile] wyrdness.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I stopped reading after the first sentence since I almost physically felt the words invading my brain and turning me to the Dark Side (other people may or may not call it science *shudders*) T'is Evil! Burn it! Burn all the gibbering knowledge! *gets out the flaming torches*

And you know, I've only had minimum levels of sugar today too.

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's science, I think it's "science," and it feels more like a college student trying to sound more intelligent by using big words than anything truly meaningful. The main page of the site seems to be studying people's political leanings and various thinking styles, but they're not very flexible when it comes to distinctions between political stances.

[identity profile] koneko-desu.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't even make it past the first sentence XDDD

[identity profile] blades-of-ice.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
GUH @_@

[identity profile] wyrdness.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Ahh, "science" *nods knowingly* I do know that it's painful to read, literally, trying to follow it has in fact given me a headache! I think you are right about it feeling like a college student trying to sound intelligent, because anyone who does know what they're on about hardly ever has to resort to anything that sounds that complicated/ complex to get their point across.

[identity profile] wyrdness.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
TFlee for your life, save yourself! It's too late for me... *shambles around like a zombie as my brain tries to comprehend the horrors of what seems very much like cthulhu mythos*

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Unless you're Marvin Harris and writing The History of Antrhopological Theory, which is the MOST BADLY WRITTEN anthropology text I've ever run across. Read the paragraph of teh test result in the post, imagine seedign it with name-dropping of various anthropologists and psychologists, then imagine that for five hundred pages. I am so not exagerrating.

AND it cost us $60 to boot. We were Not Happy with the professor for requiring it.

The worst thing is that Harris has written a nubmer of books for laymen explaining anthropological stuff. I've read them. I KNOW that the man can write in a lucid, intelligible manner! Arg!

[identity profile] apintrix.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
It's just technical language, not terrible language... I do think they're kind of obnoxious in not explaining any of it for laymen, though, given the context. It may be made up ("cognitive style" is sort of dubious), but I wouldn't dismiss it purely on the grounds of big words. There was a recent article that showed that people actually evaluate the intelligence of people who use big words as *lower* than those who use small words. I worry about these things... probably too much...

[identity profile] sophia-helix.livejournal.com 2006-03-09 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I took just enough classes as a psych major to understand most of my answer, although it seems useless to tell people where they have heightened or depressed activity without telling them what they mean. Also, those questions were whack, and a little invasive. *g*

[identity profile] rustybitch.livejournal.com 2006-03-10 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Your olfactory system plays a stronger than average role in mating behavior.

Ahahaha! You gotta tell us all about that someday.