telophase: (Dr Who - Captain Jack fanservice)
telophase ([personal profile] telophase) wrote2005-11-08 08:47 am

The essay making the rounds today...

...is on fandom and male privilege (via [livejournal.com profile] bastmoon). The thesis is basically that if a community or event or what-have-you does not explicitly cater to male privilege, then many guys (luckily, there's a lot who don't see it this way) perceive it to be actively excluding them, even when the intention to do so was not there.

Those of us who've studied a bit in feminist theory are not exactly surprised by this revelation; it happens everywhere. :D

And since I think half of you have joined me since I last told this story, let me repost what I put in a comment on the essay:

==============
A year and a half ago, I was in the artists' alley at an anime convention, with my prints spread out on the table. Approximately one-third of them had women in them, the rest are of men in various poses, none over a PG rating (the occasional bare torso; that sort of thing). A fanboy walks by, surveys my wares, and says "Oh you're one of those people." Note that none of the pictures of men had more than one character in them - nothing even hinting at yaoi. This picture of a shirtless Sanzo was about as salacious as it got. However, it seems that if I draw a man as a sexual object, even if there are no other men in the picture, I'm a yaoi fangirl.

He asked me why I drew guys, and I told him the real, true answer - that in class all day I draw women because it's easier to get female models than male ones, and so when I draw stuff for fun, I draw men - and then proceeded to rip into me about how I should draw more chicks and that I was losing tons of money by not drawing chicks.

Except that I was the only person in that corner of the artists' alley to turn a profit that con. The other two next to me, selling pictures of anime chicks - one for $2 each! I was selling at $6 each! - lost money, making less than $50 each the whole con, while I made enough to cover table fees and food for four days (four-day con) and take home a decent profit besides. What makes him think that I don't know my market? Generally speaking, fanboys don't buy art. Fangirls buy art.

As some sort of vague test, I set to work and drew a picture of one of the girls from Full Metal Panic, and made it as fanservicey as possible - arched back, buttons threatening to pop off from the strain of her breasts, panty shot, the works. For three days it didn't sell, and finally the last day it sold. To a girl. Who dragged her mother over to pay for it. Not sure what-all that proves, but it seems to prove something-or-other.


*uses boy-boy snogging icon, though, just 'cause*

[identity profile] artist-luver.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:08 pm (UTC)(link)
silly people. half dressed men = yaoi. what type of stuff have they been reading? *shaking head*

sounds like you are doing a great job in manga! bravo!

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Silly person! Only women can be objects of desire! Didn't you get the memo?

Thanks. :D

Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] mistressrenet.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
How many people clicked the link just to see Sanzo with his shirt off again?

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Hell, I did. XD

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] mscongeniality.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:46 pm (UTC)(link)
That would be me.

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] kittikattie.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I hadn't seen it--or if I had, I forgot!

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] cicer.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
*nods and raises hand*

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] cerusee.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Yo.

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] rurounitriv.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
Yo. *holds up her hand* In my defense, I hadn't seen it before.

...not that looking at half-nekkid pissy bishies needs any excuse. XD

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
Ya know, accoring to the count on DA, 125 people have clicked through to see him. XD

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] pratyeka.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not gonna lie, I clicked it FOR THE YAOI.

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Because you are ALL ABOUT THE YAOI, of course!

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] pratyeka.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
TOTALLY.

Re: Okay, show of hands:

[identity profile] tygerr.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
*raises hand*

[identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe I'm being catty, but I think that boy found himself noticing the bare-chested men and panicked. OMG, am I really a - a - AAAH! How dare this female cause me to consider my own inner nature!

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee. :D He did go on for a bit about how if girls saw two real gay guys going at it, they'd be grossed out. I did manage to get a "You would probably be surprised..." before he steamrollered over me with his rant, and I just let him fly because he'd worked up a good one and wasn't about to let anybody spoil his fun.

[identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, if "real" is defined as "guys who look like him" . . .

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I can safely say that I do not want to see that fanboy going at it with anyone. Ever. XD

[identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
I still like the story a woman told on soc.motss. She was walking in the mall and saw an attractive woman smile and walk towards her. They got closer, and then she smacked into the mirror. Hee hee hee.

[identity profile] pratyeka.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
I now cite possible mental trauma at either walking in on or unknowingly [?] downloading and watching gay sex as a possible cause for his tirade.

[identity profile] tygerr.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. None of the women *I've* ever seen watching Real Live Gayboy Action (tm) have ever appeared grossed out....

[identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Hm. It appears that lots of guys get turned on by two girls together. Yet this guy thinkis that girls would not be turned on by two guys. *shrug* ok.

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
I know - that's strange. But I'm wondering if it's because with the two girls, there's an element of "they're putting the show on for me" so that the viewer is implicitly a participant. Whereas with the guys ... guys are rarely perceived as putting a show on for women.

Hm. Dunno. Just thinking out loud.

[identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
No, I think that guy was just an idiot. [infinite-loop] "Me like gurls. So me like gurl-gurl. So everyone like gurl-gurl. Me 'phobe. Me hate boy-boy. So everyone hate boy-boy, probably even gay boys, who secretly wished they like gurls. Gurls sexy." [/infinite-loop]

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, I was talking in general - the idea that the same men who tend to like girl/girl action tend to get squicked at the idea of guy/guy action.

[identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see so much inconsistency/illogic there. I like the idea of girl/girl, and would like to be neutral about guy/guy, but I blame this homophobic society for being mildly squicked at the idea. (That didn't stop me from going to see Bad Education or laughing my ass off when my friend D found out it was about a gay tranvestite; his reading comprehension obviously sucks.)

I just think it stupid to think that if guys like girl/girl, then girls wouldn't like guy/guy. In what universe does that make any sense?

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-10 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
In the universe where it's assumed that women's sexuality exists primarily to serve men and that women's sexual fulfilment comes from that, I believe. :D
permetaform: (::ooo!:: [not mine])

[personal profile] permetaform 2005-11-11 08:20 am (UTC)(link)
oh god that's a nice icon...

::stares::

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-11 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Put on a little light music and keep watching it, and it's a total make-out session, isn't it?

[identity profile] oniko.livejournal.com 2005-11-15 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm here via [livejournal.com profile] metafandom, and this is totally OT, but I MUST KNOW what show that icon is from. Because I just lost 10 minutes staring at it.

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-15 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
XD It's from the last episode of season 1 of the new Doctor Who.

Hypnotic, isn't it?

[identity profile] janni.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I finally found the sort of male piece of art I've been looking for for years at WFC last week. We have several pictures of wistful young women on our walls, and I wanted a wistful young man. I thought this would be easy to find, but have discovered con art shows really do feature mostly women, with only a token male barbarian or wizard here or there, and none of them intended to be compelling the way the paintings of women are.

I would have had no idea had I not been consciously looking. Now that I know, I find it more than a little troubling.

OTOH, an artist friend says she once made matching paintings of a man and a woman in armor--the woman sold immediately, the man she had to give away after a couple years. So art showing women selling better was once true--but maybe things are changing?

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Things seem to be changing in the anime fandom - I certainly do well with selling primarily cute guys. I don't know about regular fandom.

I'm running the art show for ConDFW in February. Not that the art show does a whole lot of business, but if I remember, I'll check the relative amount of men and women in the pics on display, and see what sells.

Mind you, artists who've been doing it for more than a year or two have a good idea of what sells for them and tailor the art they hang to fit that, so it won't be entirely accurate, but it's certainly worth looking for. (and I may find that dragons sell more than men and women combined.)

[identity profile] tygerr.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't say so much about what *sells*, but IME there's LOTS more women than men in the art at SF/F cons, and there was much more male representation in the art at the one and only anime con I've ever attended. (Dunno if it male figures were in the *majority* or not, but the difference was striking.)

I note, too, that while there are many more girls and women attending general SF/F cons than there used to be, the aforementioned one-and-only anime con I've been to appeared (from my middle-aged male perspective, at least) to be a veritable *ocean* of teengrrl hormones. So it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the sales patterns are different for the two fandoms.

I certainly agree that while males may LOOK at a great deal of the art, females are considerably more likely to BUY it.

[identity profile] usmangaka.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
And we all know how telophase hates yaoi! xD

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
The surprising thing is, I don't especially like it. I've read three or four yaoi books and while one was fairly good, one was OK and the others were vile, and have so far not convinced me to seek it out. (You'll note, of all the Death Note doujinshi I bought at Yaoi-con, the one that's far and away my favorite actually has no porn whatsoever in it.)

Now, I make jokes about yaoi and slash a lot, and if someone whose taste I trusted recommended a yaoi book to me, I'd read it, but I'm not obsessively haunting the bookstores waiting for Tokyopop's Blu line to debut. I don't consider myself a slasher, either.

The reason Project Blue Rose is BL* is that when [livejournal.com profile] rachelmanija and I were discussing what story to do for the RSOM contest (which is what this book is expanded from), I noticed that there weren't any BL stories in the winners of the previous contests, and since they tended to pick a variety of genres, I figured that if a good BL story came in, it'd have a better chance than the umpteenth fantasy or giant-robot one. It was a marketing decision. And judging by the pre-orders on the expanded version, a pretty damn good one, at that.

Obviously, if I objected to it, I wouldn't be doing it, but I really seek out books based on characters than on the genre - I'll read just about anything if I can fall in love with or be intrigued by the characters (this goes for books and movies as well, not just manga and anime). Same goes for fanfic - I seek it out based on the characters that appear in it, and if the writer can stay in character, I'll happily read whatever cracktastic pairing they can come up with, gender be damned.


* Boys' love, if anyone out there doesn't know that yet - 'yaoi' tends to imply graphic sex, while BL doesn't.

[identity profile] cicer.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
That's interesting. I didn't know that about you!

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
:D I find it hard to explain my stance without writing an essay - I like it ok ("it" being yaoi/slash/whatever) but I'm not a fan of it. I tend to be fans of individual characters and series, but not whole genres.

Actually, I might consider myself a fan if it weren't for that damn seme/uke dichotomoy which DRIVES ME UP THE FUCKING WALL because, by God, if there's going to be power play dynamics, they're much more interesting if you've got two seme types clashing. that thought sparked by your icon XD And the gender is less important than the personalities in that case - Alucard/Integra is just as hot as L/Light. But as long as so much of yaoi consists of seme/uke type dynamics ... I won't consider myself a fan, just an occasionally appreciative reader.

I think that distictions important to me because people assume things about what yaoi fans are looking for and responding to, and that's not what I respond to. Same as with SF fandom - I usually take pains to describe myself as a lit SF fan rather than just plain old SF fan, because everyone assumes you're a Trekkie if you say you're an SF fan, and I actually rather loathe Trek, and can take or leave most media SF.

I like Project Blue Rose because I like the characters and their dynamics (even more so after I prodded [livejournal.com profile] rachelmanija into producing angstmeters for them) and their situation. The fact that they're both men who like men plays into their characters and their situations and how they respond to things, but it's not the point of the book - the point of the book is how they respond, specifically, to each other and their situation. and there will be no weepy uke scenes ever!

[identity profile] prettyism.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
thanks for posting the Sanzo pic,er, the link to male privelidge. Vaguely wonders why this guy cares what draw? Why he all up in yo' bizness, huh? I do like yaoi but other than Gravitation and Bronze(and my own work) nothing has sent me into tizzy :someone gave me a copy of loveless but I'm afraid to watch and become hooked: The soundtracks are what reeled me in so maybe I just like sexy Japanese singers? Back to your topic, this guy's a dork and you rock so who cares ^_^ :goes to study Sanzo picture for research purposes:

[identity profile] cicer.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Very good essay. It's completely true of course, and deeply frustrating to realize how biased toward men our culture still is.

[identity profile] pzb.livejournal.com 2005-11-08 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
It's funny....the hubby has been on me about drawing some fanboy bait, given that 90% of my Artist Alley art attracts women. Be that as it may, just as you said, most of my sale, either male or female subjects, have been to women. At my last con, I even took a sign-up sheet of sorts for anyone to suggest characters they'd like to see drawn. I had a good mix of male and female writing down names.... Out of 13 real suggestions (discounting the "anyone from xyz" suggestions which totally defeated the point), 3 were female characters.

So basically, it just goes to show that male or female, if it's good art, it will sell. And that guy just needs to pull the Yaoi paddle out of his ass.

[identity profile] rabican.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
I'm just trying to figure out what was running through that mother's head.

Also, I got the imps you sold me today! They are wonderful. I haven't decided whether or not Les Infortunes is for me, though it's a very subtle scent, but I love Strumpet to pieces and will be watching that company. So thanks!

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Lord only knows, but since it included "pay [livejournal.com profile] telophase $35 for one piece of original art and two prints," I'm not inquiring too closely.

Glad they worked for you! I just got a sample pack of all six scents [livejournal.com profile] beyondpale carries today, so I've been sniffing imps. Three of them are definitely not me, primarily because of vetiver, but Lushing Ken smells quite good, and Bedlam Bouquet is going to require me testing it before I reject it.

[identity profile] pratyeka.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 07:09 am (UTC)(link)
I like it how females liking anything remotely sexual makes us interested in gay sex automatically, to this type of person. I think they need to realize that just because the [fan]girls don't want to have sex with them, it doesn't mean they don't want to have sex - of their own, not a vicarious experience! - with men. This one in particular seemed to be saying something that he thought was "Sell something sexy!" and of course the major flaw in that is that you were, but the world does not change according to his tastes. I think I may have to gratuitously use the Yaoi-con icon here. And you know, as many other gay icons as possible, because I'm a straight female, everything I like is GAY! Except for my dislike of almost all actual YAOI, as opposed to original story/character BL

[identity profile] celticdragonfly.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for posting that link!!

[identity profile] telophase.livejournal.com 2005-11-09 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You're welcome. :D
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2005-11-11 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
Those of us who've studied a bit in feminist theory are not exactly surprised by this revelation; it happens everywhere. :D

Heck, those of us who read the news every Christmas know that... All these crazy!Christians whining that they're being "persecuted" by store clerks who say "Happy Holidays!" instead of "Merry Christmas", or, god forbid, town squares decorated with wintery or multicultural displays instead of nativities.

*sighs*