Entry tags:
Pitch, and the hearing thereof
I came across this Adam Neely video wherein he pitch-corrected several classic songs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxX2u8iggYI
It turns out that I cannot tell the difference. I first thought it was my speakers, so pulled it up on my phone and used my airpods, and still no difference. He mentioned a bonus video he put on the Nebula streaming service, which I ahve a subscription to. I called it up on my phone, and there was definitely a better sound quality, but still no difference.
I would occasionally hear something that was more or a warble which I think was the program doing the actual shifting, but not the pitch itself, I think, and I'd not have noticed that if I weren't trying to listen for it.
The video's divided into chapters, with the chapters linked in the description, if you want to skip to a specific song. He also interview his mom, who is a vocal coach, about the difference between singers today who grew up listening to pitch-corrected songs and singers of yester-year who grew up without that. (Spoiler: there's a difference. It's not bad, it's just a thing.)
Anyway, do any of you notice a difference? (
yhlee, I'd be very interested in your experience! It's easy enough to skip around if you don't want to listen to the whole thing.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxX2u8iggYI
It turns out that I cannot tell the difference. I first thought it was my speakers, so pulled it up on my phone and used my airpods, and still no difference. He mentioned a bonus video he put on the Nebula streaming service, which I ahve a subscription to. I called it up on my phone, and there was definitely a better sound quality, but still no difference.
I would occasionally hear something that was more or a warble which I think was the program doing the actual shifting, but not the pitch itself, I think, and I'd not have noticed that if I weren't trying to listen for it.
The video's divided into chapters, with the chapters linked in the description, if you want to skip to a specific song. He also interview his mom, who is a vocal coach, about the difference between singers today who grew up listening to pitch-corrected songs and singers of yester-year who grew up without that. (Spoiler: there's a difference. It's not bad, it's just a thing.)
Anyway, do any of you notice a difference? (

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Not perfect pitch, ever, but I used to have fairly good relative pitch--fuzzier lately from lack of use.
no subject
no subject
Some of it is subtle for me, and some of it feels Really Wrong, though I think oracne's comment indicates more dissonance than I pick up myself. FWIW some early-music exposure for me, too, though by far most of my not-random-radio-etc. is classical violin. Since Neely's remarks for the bits I heard are very blues/jazz focused, I wonder what someone intimately familiar with those domains would think....
no subject
no subject
no subject
I didn't expect that to sound as horrible as it did to me, lol!
It might be because I do a lot of early music? In which one uses a lot of different types of tuning and you get used to hearing what's appropriate for each case. Like...not forcing every single piece of music into a rigid metal box.
no subject
I'm just fascinated at the range from me, who can't hear the difference, to you, who can hear it like nails on a chalkboard!
no subject