Your argument is invalid

[telophase]

Crossposted from Glamorous in Retrospect. Author: Stephanie.

Your argument is invalid; I have Snufkin socks.

Because Snufkin. (If you are unaware of The Moomins, then I am sorry for you and your deprived childhood.)

On the back, just above the heel, is either The Mymble’s Daughter or Little My. I’m inclined towards the former because she looks pleasanter than Little My tends to be.

Edit: I forgot to add this–the little toe clip holding the socks together had a Hattifattener on it!!

Comments

[snarp]

Desire.

[telophase]

There is so much Moomin swag I wanted, but I confined myself to socks, two bento bags, tong, and the Too-ticky plushie.

[movingfinger]

What about the penguin bars? Huh?

[telophase]

:) sorry, went to no animal bars!

[rushthatspeaks.livejournal.com]

That is definitely the Mymble's daughter. You can tell by the size of the eyes.

I would worry about hiring Hattifatteners to hold together clothes, myself. The static electricity problem must be tremendous.

[telophase.livejournal.com]

The inside of the socks s really soft and fuzzy and really warm and I expect that it would be generating a lot of static if I weren't laying down watching TV right now!

[movingfinger.livejournal.com]

Agree, it's Mymble's daughter, and I add that I was shocked to find out that she and Snufkin are siblings.

Hattifatteners! you must look for Hattifattener socks, so you have a pair of clips, and make earrings or something!

[telophase.livejournal.com]

I rembered that the Joxter was Snufkin's dad, but had forgotten about the Mymble being his mum.