(no subject)
Just wondering -- were there so few comments on my giant post o'book reviews because nobody had anything to say, or because nobody bothered to read them? (If it's the latter, I can safely give up feeling guilty over not posting book reviews of most of the stuff I read and just stop doing it.)
In other news: halfway through the first day of no sweets, and it's going fine. Not that I usually indulge this early in the day, anyway...
In other news: halfway through the first day of no sweets, and it's going fine. Not that I usually indulge this early in the day, anyway...
no subject
I skimmed that post because most of the books seemed to be things I wouldn't be interested in reading anyway (I don't mind mystery as a genre, but I have so many things on my to-read pile that I'm not taking it on right now). I mostly read review posts if they're about books I might conceivably pick up to read on my own inclination. (This means that I categorically skip romance novel reviews, yeah.)
no subject
(There was only one mystery in the bunch, and I didn't get mroe than three chapters in! XD Not that the rest of them seem like the sort of book you'd go for, anyway. I do have Michio Kaku's Physics of the Impossible sitting on my Kindle, waiting to be read...)
no subject
Most of what I get from talking to a romance writer of my acquaintance is that the genre is even more alien than I realize, and if I read more of it I would see just how alien the conventions are to me (note: not wrong, just different), but she says it would be very rare for me to enjoy a romance, and from my limited explorations in the area, I tend to concur. If someone wrote a math-based romance [1], I would totally be there, but I am cognizant that this would be such a tiny potential audience that it would largely not be worth anyone's while to write. ^_^
[1] I tried once, but failed miserably. It was an experiment back in college. ^_^
no subject
I bounced off the first ten pages, hard. Eventually swapped it on paperbackswap.com.