(no subject)
Just wondering -- were there so few comments on my giant post o'book reviews because nobody had anything to say, or because nobody bothered to read them? (If it's the latter, I can safely give up feeling guilty over not posting book reviews of most of the stuff I read and just stop doing it.)
In other news: halfway through the first day of no sweets, and it's going fine. Not that I usually indulge this early in the day, anyway...
In other news: halfway through the first day of no sweets, and it's going fine. Not that I usually indulge this early in the day, anyway...
no subject
I skimmed that post because most of the books seemed to be things I wouldn't be interested in reading anyway (I don't mind mystery as a genre, but I have so many things on my to-read pile that I'm not taking it on right now). I mostly read review posts if they're about books I might conceivably pick up to read on my own inclination. (This means that I categorically skip romance novel reviews, yeah.)
no subject
(There was only one mystery in the bunch, and I didn't get mroe than three chapters in! XD Not that the rest of them seem like the sort of book you'd go for, anyway. I do have Michio Kaku's Physics of the Impossible sitting on my Kindle, waiting to be read...)
no subject
Most of what I get from talking to a romance writer of my acquaintance is that the genre is even more alien than I realize, and if I read more of it I would see just how alien the conventions are to me (note: not wrong, just different), but she says it would be very rare for me to enjoy a romance, and from my limited explorations in the area, I tend to concur. If someone wrote a math-based romance [1], I would totally be there, but I am cognizant that this would be such a tiny potential audience that it would largely not be worth anyone's while to write. ^_^
[1] I tried once, but failed miserably. It was an experiment back in college. ^_^
no subject
I bounced off the first ten pages, hard. Eventually swapped it on paperbackswap.com.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
---L.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I in fact did want to ask you about NetGalley accounts. I'm not a professional librarian, nor do I get paid to review, but I do write for a very large team-specific baseball blog and I have done the occasional baseball book review. I'm wondering if it's worth it to try to get an account. Most of the baseball books I've seen there I have on hold at the local library anyway and will get reviewed if there's relevant content to the blog. (Our editor-in-chief got an email from a publicist about a new Derek Jeter biography. We're a specific team blog, and the team isn't the Yankees. I guess....)
no subject
(If you've got a Kindle, they're currently not offering most books on Kindle due to some technical issue thing, but that's due to change sometime this month. Other e-readers and computers are still fine.)
no subject
I have a Sony Reader, so no problems there, although I'm dreading the day where everything will be either Nook or Kindle.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(BTW, Leaving Mother Lake: A Girlhood at the Edge of the World, a memoir of a girl growing up in Tibet, in a matriarchal culture, is $2.99 on Kindle today.)
no subject
no subject
But I didn't have anything to say about the specific books you were talking about as I haven't read any of them. I still enjoyed reading it, though, and have wishlisted a bunch of the non-fiction titles that sounded interesting.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(it took me three tries to spell "thanks" correctly, sigh...)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I highly recommend people read the Gutenberg book! It's a bit slow at first, but ramps up near the end (and is fairly short), to the point where there was a Sudden Reveal and my thought was "Why, of course that happened! How could it not?!"
no subject
no subject
no subject