Entry tags:
(no subject)
This is the picture of Sesshoumaru right after I scanned it in (in two parts) and merged the two files. It's at the size I inked it at - although it's still at 72ppi for Web display, so looks a wee bit blocky - but you can see the ink blobs and where I managed to drag my hand and where the French curve I was using to steady my pen on the sword slipped. And how I overdid the lines on the hair, making it into tentacles, and had to erase a lot of that to make it nice and smooth-flowing.
And, oh yeah, where I figured out that his face was wonky and before I fixed it.

And, oh yeah, where I figured out that his face was wonky and before I fixed it.


no subject
no subject
no subject
Great hair-day!
no subject
no subject
It still manages to look good though, but it involves a sword, pointy ears and flowy hair, so that automatically makes things good to me ;)
no subject
no subject
*boggles*
(IANA Artist, so cannot provide useful commentary beyond gape-jawed amazement.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Actually, part of my problem with that movie is that when he is done, I don't get the end product. Perhaps in my defense, sketches are supposed to be evocative rather than finished / accurate depictions, and despite that, I still expect the latter rather than the former, to which I am blind.
no subject
You're supposed to be looking at rhythm of line, composition, the play of lights and darks across the figure, the shapes and volumes itneracting, and so on. Much of which is not in the scene or model that the artist is looking on - it comes from the artist's head. It's like you'll rarely find great photographs that are a straight snapshot of a scene - the photographer will either have spent a very long time setting it up, waiting for the right light, or managed to get lucky enough to grab the shot the instant it was seen and recognized (and the latter is the product of experience, to recognize and shoot instantly, and much of the time the results still aren't good).
And if the movie doesn't use real sketches and paintings that are already in existence, the ones in it are most likely not going to be that good, merely acceptable, because for some reason movies never actually do get original works that are any good. It's probably because unless you're a genius, and even much of the time when you're a genius, you can't produce great works on demand, and the true worth of such work is unaffordable even by Hollywood standards. You just have to pretend that the artwork is an actor portraying a great painting. XD